Re: the List…

Here’s what I know for sure. ( No…stop that.)

Here’s what I think I know for sure. ( Better…keep going…)

Here’s what I would really like to know for sure. ( Closer…good…)

Here’s what I would really like to believe I once knew for sure. ( That’s it!!)

*****

All right then. It’s time to have another crack at the list.

*****

Here it is again;

Reap What You Sow

As Above, So Below

Yin/Yang

An Eye for an Eye

Action/Re-action

Karma

Do Unto Others

*****

And here is a bit of background concerning how this list seems to have assembled itself. Over a rather long period of time, I began to take note of things ( list items ) that all seemed to have some obtuse quality in common; that inherent echo of what most would perceive as ‘truth.’

And in spite of all the list items being from a very widely different array of sources, they all hold that ‘ echo’ quality in common; hence the saying ‘ it rings true’ ?

That’s how the list started. And what is most important is not what historic era or culture they derive from, but the discernable echo that each provides. This also indicates that the list is not complete, and by nature could never be. There are likely many things that could make it onto such a list; but this one is mine ( so far…)

 I suspect that we like people all have our own personally tailored  ways of perceiving those echoes, and also of interpreting them. And that is precisely when things usually begin to get very dicy and complicated. So; I’ll jump right in while there’s a bit of clarity to be had.

***** 

All the list items come from very widely diverse sources. ” Reap what You Sow” and “An Eye for an Eye” both stem from the Old Testament; ” As Above, So Below” is a reference from Aleister Crowley in regard to the use of magic; ” Yin/ Yang”  is from Taoism; ” Action/ Reaction” refers to Newton’s Third Law of Motion.

These five items in particular have much in common.

They share what I’ve come to think of as a presumption of balance. What I mean by that is this;

If something occurs that sets forces in motion, then those forces will ultimately return to a state of rest, of passivity. To be in a passive state of resolved motion, of resolved energies, of resolved anything is their natural order, and they will return to that balance.

 

To properly consider any of those first five items, you must begin with the observation that, in each case, a state of passivity and balance was disturbed. The inherent implication of each is that the restoration of balance is an absolute.

In this regard, each list item could be seen to be structured as a simple mathematical equation. An equation is not considered ‘solved’ unless the elements on each side of  “=” are resolved to one another; in balance once again.

It’s quite the same for those first five items; they’re all about balance being restored. The inherent ‘ truth’ that they share is founded on you ( the observer) being absolutely cognizant of that certainty. That’s what ‘echoes’ back to us when we consider any of them from a philosophic or moral standpoint ( even though some of them had very different connotations when they were first known.)  They all presume your observation of the state of rest or passivity as being the original state, as the natural state.

And they each in their own way instruct that the state of balance and rest will be absolutely restored, if in fact it has been disturbed.

The thread that I’ve been trying to get to in regard to these five is very elusive. I’ve long since decided for myself that the evidence of spiritual or philosophic truths lies in their utter stark simplicity, and the crux of the human condition is rooted in our tendency to chronically overlook the obvious.  Humans have always shown a tendency to extrapolate on such matters, constantly moving away from the source of the ‘ echo’ ; constantly adding complexities to our perceptions.

These five items are all taken from widely differing cultures and applications; that is of no value here. The thread they have in common is much, much more important than any other aspect. And it is so very disarmingly simple that you will miss it, go back and look for it again and again, feel it to be ever just out of your grasp. Occult.

All things will resolve themselves whether we understand their process or not. Our understanding is not prerequisite to anything at all.

Some of the items come from religion; some from philosophy; some from physics and science; one from ” occult studies’ ( for lack of a better term).

And with all this in mind, allow me to make an outlandish claim;

They’re all describing exactly the same thing.

The differences, if you see any, are in your own perceptions and prejudices.

I know you don’t agree. How could you? That’s preposterous.

Just allow me a few indulgences, if you can.

Give yourself a few minutes to gather all your objections together, whatever they are.

Now visualize yourself putting them all into a paper bag.

Now, visualize putting the bag down on the ground at your feet.

Now turn and walk away.

Now… think of the items on the list again. If you can look past your objections, then you’ll stand a much better chance of seeing beyond the items themselves, to the thread in common.

And if that happens, I suppose you might find a few chestnuts of your own, for your own list. If you do, please let me know; send me a comment. I’d be very intrigued to see what other people find.

After a brief respite, I’ll have a look at the heavy artillery on my list; Karma and Do Unto Others. Neither seems primarily concerned with balance, per se, but with consequences.

And don’t I know it…

Advertisements
Published in: on February 29, 2012 at 9:31 pm  Comments (1)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://rogercoyne.wordpress.com/2012/02/29/re-the-list/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One CommentLeave a comment

  1. Aha! Your qualifin’, quantifyin’ rogerian self is in conflict with your secondary (yes, I said 2nd a-r-y) clarklike self. Hurray!
    But here’s the thing. I have been so busy shoring up my scottian aspect lately that I can’t quite grasp the vocabulary with which to comment here! Aagh! I read your words… “know” what I should be saying but for some reason….the words won’t come:(!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: